Reproductive
Health and Reproductive Rights
Reproductive health and reproductive rights stand for a traditional
approach to anchor family planning as a human right.
The concept has been linked to family planning by the UN
Population Department under the umbrella term human rights since 1966.
Result of
the World Population Conference 1994
At the World Population Conference in Cairo in 1994,
reproductive rights and international population policy were linked with "health"
under the name Sexual and reproductive health and rights ( SRHR for short ).
Internationally active population and development organizations such as the
International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), WHO, UNFPA, USAID, and the
World Bank have since defined sexual and reproductive health and rights as
goals of human rights-based politics.
Reproductive health
and reproductive rights continue to be the primary paradigm for population
control. The industrialized countries since 1958 (according to the Coale- Hoover
study) to the developing countries state
that a slowdown in population growth is necessary for sustainable (economic)
development to be.
Each person is thus granted the right to lead a satisfactory
sex life and (officially) to decide on the number of his children himself. It
is required that everyone should have access to information about contraception
and to safe, effective, and affordable contraception. In addition, every woman
should have access to medical care during pregnancy and childbirth. Thirdly, everyone should be able to receive
health services that protect them from or treat sexual diseases. The focus
should be on individual rights to self-determination, physical integrity, and
non-discrimination.
Situation
today
In many countries around the world, people cannot fully
exercise their "reproductive rights" (including abortion). It is
argued that the main reason for this is poverty (costs for education and
contraception).
The fight against female genital mutilation is assigned to
this traditional approach by the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and
Development.
Reception
A comprehensive reform of population policy was promised in
the final document of the World Population Conference in Cairo. Critics of that
last document, however, assume merely rhetorical concessions (rhetorical shift). With regard to the
incongruity of women affected by self-determination rights and the fulfillment
of neo-colonial demands, one speaks of "ideological schizophrenia."
"With the feminization of argument succeeded the
population lobby - relying on women's health - with, to make matters to be
discussed term reproductive rights' to a rhetorical relatively uncontroversial
problem area." (Többe Gonçalves 2000).
"In this respect, the health discourse is the central
'content-related' hinge for the re-articulation of the population-political
macro and micro level after Cairo ." (Schultz 2006).
"The activists did not imagine when they signed onto
the population control movement that they would merely be presentation
consultants. It is telling that many Third World feminists have refused to
endorse population control programs at all, arguing instead that these programs
violate the rights of women while ignoring their real needs. It must be painful
for Western feminists to contemplate, but their own movement has 'co-opted,' to
use Betsy Hartmann's term, by another movement for whom humankind as a whole,
and women, in particular, remain an anonymous mass of numbers to be exact, that
is to say, contracepted, aborted, and sterilized.
스포츠토토 Thank you for your blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on…
ReplyDelete스포츠토토티비 I can see that you are an expert at your field! I am launching a website soon, and your information will be very useful for me.. Thanks for all your help and wishing you all the success ..
ReplyDelete스포츠토토 Thanks for your publication; wild style. Many thanks sharing your article.
ReplyDelete